LONDON 2012: Tottenham call for legal guarantee the athletics track stays for good
TOTTENHAM Hotspur believe awarding West Ham the Olympic Stadium severely risks greater strain on the public purse amid fears the commitment to athletics will not last.

NO GO: Tottenham's plans to move to the Olympic Stadium can be consigned to the scrapheap
The 14-strong Olympic Park Legacy Company today unanimously selected West Ham, who have pledged to keep the athletics track to honour the commitment made by London 2012 organisers, as long-term tenants for the stadium after the Games.
To date it has been the taxpayer who has largely footed the bill for the £537m stadium and Spurs have always maintained that keeping the track was not commercially viable.
They made no bones about their intentions to rip up the athletics track and honour the athletics commitment by renovating the Crystal Palace athletics stadium - but the OPLC believe West Ham will best honour the London 2012 legacy.
Critics of West Ham's bid suggest they will fall between two stools however, creating a soulless football stadium and an arena, used sporadically for athletics events with small crowds and plenty of empty seats.
Some go as far as to suggest that when that happens, West Ham will break their pledge to athletics and tear up the track.
And in the aftermath of the OPLC's decision, Spurs have released a statement calling for the track to be legally guaranteed.
"It was never an option that we would retain the running track as we believe this to be unacceptable for our supporters and therefore wholly unviable in the long term," reads the statement.
"It carries with it the major risk of being incapable of delivering a lasting legacy without further calls on the public purse or a requirement for changes to the stadium and track at a later date.
"Much has been made of the promise to keep the athletics track within the Olympic Stadium and, therefore, we should all expect to see the retention of this track firmly embedded and legally guaranteed by those entrusted with this legacy commitment, today and in the future."
Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy has recently suggested that should Tottenham lose out, they could seek a judicial review.
The club statement contained no mention of legal action but confirmed Tottenham would be monitoring the situation closely with two Government ministers and the Mayor of London Boris Johnson still to ratify the decision.
The statement continued: "We submitted an honest bid with the only solution we considered capable of delivering lasting regeneration, a significant return to the public purse and wide-ranging benefits to the local communities and to London.
"The OPLC's decision has still to be approved by two Government departments and the Mayor's Office.
"We shall continue to monitor the bid process over the coming weeks up until its final determination, whilst reviewing our position and holding discussions with our advisors.
"We shall spend time assessing our situation in respect of a new stadium and when we have any further information we shall update our supporters."

Comments
As a Spurs fan who wants a
As a Spurs fan who wants a new stadium I have to say I have mixed emotions. We desperatly need a bigger stadium but I dont care if its not this one as long as we can make it happen. Frankly I think Ms Brady has fooled the nation and that makes me sad. Telling them spurs would waste a £500m staduim and taxpayers money. 2/3 of the stadium was designed to be TEMPORARY and removed after the games. Spurs planned to do as the architect intended and then develop the site with our own funds. Ms Brady and Co plan to spend almost £100m more of london taxpayers money on making this temporary structure a viable long term structure. And how much will it cost them in the future? well with Newham council in on the bid the people of Newham might be maintaining this stadium for a long while yet. Good luck to west ham but I just cant see how it will work for the fans at all. And as for athletics. The original design was to downsize this staduim to a 25,000 seater one with the temporary structure removed. Well the only reason this didnt happen is because UK athletics could not afford to follow through with the original plans to keep it themselves. Everyone sees this as Spurs v Westham and it never was. The design was wrong from the start with no forward planning and the people involved should be made to explain why almost £650m of our taxes will go towards such a badlt designed not fit for purpose staduim. Just think of what that could have built if west ham were in there helping design it from the very start. The people of london have been totally done! But with that i really do hope west ham can do something with it and i hope their fans forgive them for not trying to get them a nicer stadium. I had hoped that athletics would get it 100% downsized as it was designed but sadly now nobody gets a good deal.
maybe not put football
maybe not put football headlines on your special site for special people, then football fans would not comment
Ah football fans.
Ah football fans. Intelligent debate, the nuance of every story examined in detail. This is an Olympics website, please find somewhere more suitable for your informed analysis
Sorry everyone.... im
Sorry everyone.... im actually a moron! Even though I have nothing useful to say I had to post to show everyone that I can use words like 'nuance'. Im just a biggoted fool who wants to slag off football fans. Even if many of them are intelligent hard working people who have as much right to an opinion as I do. Sorry everyone!
Resign Mr Levy - your grand
Resign Mr Levy - your grand idea no-one wanted - not the fans, not the general public and not a single one of the 14 people making the decision. How much money have you wasted? Are you going to pay it back?
blah blah blah, get over it
blah blah blah, get over it already
Olympic Stadium
Sour grapes eh Mr Levy and co - so the very people who wanted nothing but to rip up the track now want a legal guarantee from the winners who promised to keep it that the track will stay - duh - no wonder you lost the bid
Post new comment